Karpal Singh says he wants a royal commission of inquiry and a tribunal set up to investigate the 'copycat' judge and is surprised by CJ's letter to him that there is no case against Malik.
âWhat I want is a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) and a tribunal set up under Article 125 (3) of the Federal Constitution to enquire into the plagiarism allegations against Malik under the laws that existed in 2000.
âFor the record, I have not made any complaint to Chief Justice (Arifin Zakaria) in relation to misconduct on the part of Malik,â he said in a statement today.
Karpal was responding to a letter that he received from Arifin in which the latter stated that Karpalâs complaint had no merit and has been dismissed in accordance with Section 13 (1) of Judgesâ Code of Ethics 2009.
According to Karpal, he had written a letter to Malik on Aug 22, indicating his intention to move a motion against him in Parliament under Article 127 for misconduct in relation to the plagiarism (matter).
âThere was no reply from Malik. I wrote another letter to him on Sept 29 stating that as there was no response to my allegation, it left me with no alternative but to move a substantive motion against him.
âI also stated that I was extending the letter dated Aug 22 to the Chief Justice and president of the Court of Appeal Md Raus Sharif,â Karpal said.
CJ: Claim has no merit
Arifin, meanwhile, said the complaint linking Malik to plagiarising a Singapore court judgment in 2000 had no merit.
A statement from the Chief Justiceâs Office issued by Arifinâs special officer I, Che Wan Zaidi Che Wan Ibrahim, said the decision was reached after investigations and a discussion with Raus.
âThe CJ carried out an investigation. Based on his findings and after discussing with the Court of Appeal president in accordance with Section 13(1) of the Judges Code of Ethics 2009, the CJ is of the opinion that Karpalâs allegations of plagiarism by the Appeal Court judge has no merit and the complaint is hereby rejected,â said Che Wan Zaidi.
He said the CJ received a complaint letter dated Sept 29, 2011, from Karpal which claimed that an Appeal Court judge had plagiarised the judgment of a Singapore court judge.
Karpal had been officially informed of the matter in a letter from the CJâs office, said Che Wan Zaidi.
âMalik has seven daysâ
Karpal said that he received a reply from the CJ on Oct 13 asking for âmore specific informationâ in relation to his allegations.
âI responded (to the CJ) by a letter dated Oct 27 stating that the law minister at that time, Rais Yatim, had publicly stated that he knew about the allegations of plagiarism and was aware of the investigations (by the Singapore judiciary),â he said.
Karpal added that on Dec 7, he had again written to the CJ indicating that the parliamentary motions that he put up against Malik had lapsed (on Dec 1) and that âhe had no alternative but to seek other measuresâ.
âI gave him seven days to reply, failing which I would take it as a public admission that he was guilty of plagiarism,â said Karpal.
Karpal had in October revealed that the Singapore judiciary had identified Malek as having plagiarised the judgment of Singapore High Court judge GP Selvam in 2000.
Malik was found to have copied Selvamâs judgment on a copyright case while serving as Johor High Court judge in 2000.
Karpal had earlier in Parliament called for Malikâs immediate resignation, saying it would save the Malaysian judiciary from further embarrassment. Malik is currently a Court of Appeal judge.