Storify Feed Feedburner Facebook Twitter Flickr Youtube Vimeo

ROS Lboard

DAP: No need for debate over Jelapang

 | July 30, 2012

Perak DAP chief says DAP will shortlist the candidates for Jelapng and Pakatan Rakyat will have the final say.

PETALING JAYA: Perak DAP chief Ngeh Koo Ham said there is no need for a debate to decide who is the best candidate to contest the Jelapang state seat.

Ngeh said the candidate for Jelapang would be shortlisted by the DAP and finalised by Pakatan Rakyat.

Ngeh. who is also the Beruas MP and Sitiwan state assemblyman, said this in response to Anything But Umno activist, Haris Ibrahim’s suggestion that both DAP and PSM candidates have a friendly debate over issues affecting Jelapang.

Haris offered to organise the debate and was supportive of PSM deputy chairman M Sarasvathy to be fielded in Jelapang during a gathering in Ipoh last night.

Sarasvathy had contested against DAP’s Hee Yit Foong and MCA in 2008.

Hee won but subsequently declared herself as Barisan Nasional-friendly independent and that led to the fall of Pakatan state government in 2009.

On the possible candidate, Ngeh confirmed that Teh Hock Ke, a water engineer-turned-insurance manager, is among those considered favourites to contest in Jelapang.

“He is among the 20-member team who is servicing Jelapang DAP service centre,” said Ngeh.

In contrast, Sarasvathy said that PSM is running three service centres in Jelapang, Pusing and in Taman Rishah.

Also read:

Debate for Jelapang seat, says Haris


Comments

Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.

Comments