Storify Feed Feedburner Facebook Twitter Flickr Youtube Vimeo

ROS Lboard

George Kent gets Ampang LRT contract

 | July 31, 2012

National transport company Prasarana confirmed that the water manufacturer was getting the contract to build the Ampang LRT's system works extension.

PETALING JAYA: George Kent (Malaysia) Berhad, a company well-versed with water pipes, has been given the system works contract on the Ampang Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) extension project.

An official statement by Syarikat Prasarana Negara Berhad confirmed that the project would be handled by a George Kent-Lion Pacific joint-venture.

This was despite a recent PKR exposé which alleged that the George Kent-Lion Pacific JV (or Consortium) was unable to manage the project from both a technical and financial standpoint.

“Prasarana, the project and asset owner for the LRT Line Extension Project, would like to officially announce that the contract for Engineering, Procurement, Construction, Testing and Commissioning of System Works for the Ampang Line Extension Project is awarded to George Kent – Lion Pacific JV,” said Prasarana Group communication head Masnizam Hisham.

According to her, the JV was run by fully-local companies, and were “well supported” by “reputable local and international multi-disciplinary technical partners”.

She added that except for the access card component (which had not been tendered yet), Prasarana had awarded all its Line Extension Project contracts.

“In all, the construction cost for the entire project is below the original budgeted cost of RM7 billion,” she said.

Although the statement did not specify how much the George Kent Consortium’s contract cost, previous reports showed that the JV got the job for RM1.2 billion.

This amount was seen in a copy of a letter allegedly signed by the Treasury’s Procurement Committee (JPMK) under secretary Fauziah Yaacob and addressed to Prasarana group managing director Shahril Mokhtar.

Until now, Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who is allegedly closely-linked to George Kent’s bosses, could not confirm nor deny that the JV got the project despite the original tender was won by another company.

It was previously reported that the George Kent consortium was unable to handle the project’s specifications, according to a September 2011 technical evaluation report by Halcrow, an engineering consultant company.

The company, as pointed out by PKR, did not appear to have any previous rail-related experience, and that its largest project to date was worth less than RM40 million.

Rafizi: Najib doesn’t care

In an immediate response, PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli – who exposed the contract’s details- said that he was speechless with the official announcement.

He said that given the exposés, he expected the Prime Minister to stop the project from going to George Kent.

“I have to say, I know they had all the intention to award this to George Kent, but I thought that Najib was more concerned about his popularity and how the public viewed him.

“…I thought our exposé, bringing this to the public would have swayed him to back off, but I clearly don’t think he cares.

He added that now that safety concerns were very valid, given George Kent’s performance according to Halcrow’s appraisal.

Rafizi also said that if Najib was willing to push this project through despite all the open attention, he wondered what more with contracts that were not as public.

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has since started an investigation into the matter. It is not known how far they have gone.


Comments

Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.

Comments