Storify Feed Feedburner Facebook Twitter Flickr Youtube Vimeo

ROS Lboard

‘Najib instructed Cecil to draft Bala’s SD2′

 | March 16, 2013

Americk Sidhu, PI Bala's lawyer makes a startling revelation at the Bar AGM that Cecil Abraham confided in him that he prepared the 2nd SD on instructions from Najib

UPDATED

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Bar was today told that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak had instructed  senior lawyer Cecil Abraham to prepare the second statutory declaration for former private investigator P Balasubramaniam.

Balasubramaniam’s lawyer Americk Sidhu revealed this during the ongoing  Malaysian Bar’s annual general meeting (AGM) today, where Balasubramaniam’s SD2 was one of the motions tabled to be discussed.

PKR vice president R Sivarasa tweeted: “Americk Singh Sidhu, PI Bala’s lawyer reveals in Bar AGM that Cecil Abraham told him he did the 2nd SD on instructions from PM Najib.”

Americk, who drafted Balasubramaniam’s SD I, later confirmed the statement.

Speaking to reporters outside of the AGM’s venue, Americk said he met Abraham at a restaurant near his office in Jalan Ampang two weeks ago.

He claimed that in the 30-minute conversation, Abraham apologised to him over the drafting of SD2 and admitted that it was done on the instruction of Najib.

Americk said he had promised Abraham to keep the information between themselves, but he opted to reveal it today after considering the late Balasubramaniam’s quest for justice.

“Balasubramaniam has been courageous to pursue justice for a Mongolian woman. I felt it is necessary for me to carry on his quest,” he said, in reference to the private investigator who passed away yesterday of a heart ailment.

Americk hoped the authorities would take Abraham’s confessions into account and reopen the case.

“We have been saying Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar Umar (both of whom were convicted of Altantuya’s murder) would not have murdered somebody they don’t know.

“The question is who ordered this? Why was the chain of command not tendered out in court?” he asked.

Motion withdrawn

Americk also said the motion to discuss Bala’s SD2 was withdrawn because delegates felt it was technically wrong for the AGM to direct the Bar to set up an independent investigation committee.

He also said the motion was also arguably redundant because the Bar began its probe into the case since last December.

Fadiah Nadwa Fikri, one of the proposers of the motion, told FMT that she might lodge a police report against Abraham for criminal offence for covering up a murder.

Balasubramaniam, in his second SD announced on July 4, 2008  retracted all his shocking allegations linking Najib to the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.

This came a day after he published his first statutory declaration, in which he claimed Najib and aide Abdul Razak Baginda had an intimate relationship with Altantuya.

In the first SD, Bala claimed that he was hired by Abdul Razak to deal with Altantuya’s harassment of the duo and Najib had direct involvement in the murder of the Mongolian national.

Carpet trader Deepak Jaikishan first revealed that a “Tan Sri” lawyer and his son had been involved in the preparation of the second SD in an interview with PAS organ Harakah in December, 2012.

There had been much speculation over the identity of the “Tan Sri” lawyer  ever since.

Meanwhile, Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo, said Najib should respond to the allegation by Americk Sidhu that the second SD was prepared on his instructions.

“The Bar Council should also tell us why there has been a delay in the probe into this complaint. The Bar Council is unusually slow in its probe of this matter,” said Gobind.


Comments

Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.

Comments