Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

ROS LBoard 1

Motion to debate supply of rabies vaccine rejected

 | July 27, 2017

Deputy Speaker Ismail Mohamed Said tells Bandar Kuching MP Chong Chieng Jen that health ministry has carried out various measures to curb the problem.


Ismail-Mohamed-Said-chong-Chieng-Jen-vaccine-rabies-1KUALA LUMPUR: A motion to debate the supply of the anti-rabies vaccine, raised by Bandar Kuching MP Chong Chieng Jen, was rejected by the Dewan Rakyat.

Deputy Speaker Ismail Mohamed Said said the health ministry has carried out various measures to curb the problem.

“You have said that you have already received a reply from the Speaker. Your request has been rejected,” he said at the Dewan Rakyat.

However, while explaining the matter, he was interupted by Chong who said he was not pleased with the decision.

“YB when you were talking, I did not interupt but when I am giving a ruling, you need to be patient,” Ismail said.

Chong said he was raising the issue as rabies had claimed five lives so far in Sarawak.

“I have received the letter from the Speaker but I feel the clarification cannot be accepted because the matter also comes under the veterinary department too,” Chong said.

Chong said the issue on the lack of the anti-rabbies vaccine needed to be debated further.

“We need to discuss the issue further and in detail,” he added.

Several days earlier Health Minister Dr S Subramaniam told opposition MPs not to create panic as the ministry had enough anti-rabies vaccines in its stockpile.

He had said it was an attempt by the opposition, particularly from Sarawak, to exploit the situation politically and misrepresent facts to mislead the people.

Subramaniam had also said the ministry had only used around 2,000 out of 8,000 vaccines in its stockpile for humans.

Meanwhile, around 17,800 animals have been vaccinated by the veterinary services department.


Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.