Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

ROS LBoard 1

Reason is part of Islamic scholarship, says academic

 | October 22, 2017

Theologian Isham Pawan Ahmad says the current Muslim authorities have a problem with views challenging prevailing understanding of Islam.

forum-irfKUALA LUMPUR: The religious authorities’ aversion to the use of reason in understanding Islamic texts is against the spirit of challenging prevailing views on the religion as practised by Muslim scholars during the early stage of the development of the Islamic jurisprudence, a theologian told a forum today.

Speaking at a forum convened by Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF) on the question, “Is reason a threat to faith and society?”, Isham Pawan Ahmad said it was this that allowed a Muslim scholar like Imam Shafie to challenge the prevailing religious ideas of his time including those of Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifah, whose teachings led to the development of the Maliki and Hanafi schools in Sunni Islam.

He said had Shafie’s criticism of other scholars been made in this era when dissenting views are silenced, he would have got into trouble with the authorities.

“The religious authority would have arrested the guy,” said the associate professor in Theology at the International Islamic University of Malaysia.

Isham said Shafie had opposed many ideas by Imam Malik, who founded the Maliki school of jurisprudence.

He said Prophet Muhammad too rebelled against his society in the early stages of his prophethood.

“Islam is a religion that rejects the idea of authority. If it wasn’t for the Prophet rebelling against the authority of the time, Islam would have never been established,” he said.

Isham added that it was the Prophet’s challenge of the status quo that infuriated the Arab leaders of that time.

“Prophet Muhammad’s call would not have been denounced if he had not called for an equal society, where there was no aristocratic Arab leaders.”


Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.