Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

ROS LBoard 1

Did the govt effectively pay Geely to acquire Proton?

May 29, 2017

For those who have yet to do the simple mathematics, Geely is paying only RM170 million to acquire a 49% stake in Proton when the Government is about to inject RM1.35 billion cash into the carmaker.



By Tony Pua

After more than a decade of tie-up talks with car manufacturers around the world, including repeated on-off talks with Volkswagen, Proton finally tied the knot with China’s rising upstart Geely, which took over Volvo in 2010.

The debate since has focused on two issues – first, the “loss” of a “national car” and second, the Government relieved of all future obligations to finance the company which has bled taxpayers for more than 20 years.

The issue of a “national” car has always been one of misplaced ego and pride. A “national” car doesn’t add value to the country’s economy if it doesn’t create sufficient jobs and a competitive industry.

On the other hand, if every foreign vehicle manufacturer wants to set up a factory in Malaysia, it’ll create thousands of jobs, facilitate knowledge and technology transfer, create a highly competitive industry and ultimately provide a big boost to our wealth and economy, even if the so-called brands are not “national”.

Hence the yardstick by which we must measure the Geely acquisition must be by it’s plans for Proton. The markets are still clueless as to how much investment Geely will bring into Proton other than the meagre cost of acquiring DRB-Hicom’s 49.9% stake in Proton for RM170 million.

If Geely has no plans to further invest in strengthening Proton’s technical capacity, then the latter will pretty much fade into oblivion. We are not even sure if Geely intends to fully utilise the oft-cited “excess capacity” in Proton to produce more cars, regardless of whether they are branded Proton, Geely or Volvo.

The Second Finance Minister, Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani boasted that the Geely acquisition will bring back Proton’s “glory days”, further adding that there will be no more subsidies for Proton after the final payment of RM1.1 billion.

In addition, the Ministry of Finance will disburse the final RM250 million from the RM1.5 billion soft loan provided to Proton last year.

For those that did the simple mathematics, effectively, Geely is paying only RM170 million to acquire a 49% stake in a company that the Government is about to inject RM1.35 billion (RM1.1bn + RM250mil) of cash.

As highlighted above, to date, there has been no mention at all of any commitment or additional investment by Geely into Proton in order to turn around the beleagured “national” carmaker.

Hence, despite the fact that Proton is already a private company sold to DRB-Hicom in 2012, it looks like the Government is effectively bailing out DRB-Hicom, a company owned by Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhari, by indirectly “paying” Geely to make it worthwhile for the latter to acquire 49% of Proton.

The action by the Ministry of Finance is completely inexplicable, making absolutely no financial sense. What is the point of privatising Proton by selling its entire stake to DRB Hicom when at the end of the day, the Government continues to “finance” the company’s sustenance?

This further raises the question – if Geely fails to resuscitate Proton and gives up on the company, will the Government step in again to keep Proton on life support?

Tony Pua is MP for Petaling Jaya Utara and DAP National Publicity Secretary.

With a firm belief in freedom of expression and without prejudice, FMT tries its best to share reliable content from third parties. Such articles are strictly the writer’s personal opinion. FMT does not necessarily endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider.


Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.