School culture is critical, not language
Writer says nostalgia for a return to English-medium schools like in the 50s and 60s is misguided as the competency, dedication and discipline was different then.
By Ravinder Singh
There is talk that English-medium schools should be brought back to raise the standard of education and particularly that of the English language.
That by simply bringing back these schools would produce students like the schools of the 50s and 60s did is a fallacy, a perception.
I wonder how many of those wishing for the re-introduction of English-medium schools have first-hand knowledge of what those schools were like? Or are their wishes based on just looking across the causeway and comparing the English-medium schools there with our sekolah kebangsaan?
What makes a school good is not really the medium of instruction.
Education is a journey, like going from point A to point B hundreds of kilometres away.
One can go by bus, by private car, by train, by flight, even cycle or walk. If one takes a car, it depends on the condition of the car, not its brand.
Even a small, old car that is well maintained and driven by a competent driver, could get you there safely.
On the other hand, an expensive car that is poorly maintained and driven by a reckless driver could break down or crash and leave you stranded on the highway.
Similarly, even a sekolah kebangsaan that is well managed, that is headed by a master teacher, that maintains strict discipline, that has dedicated, well-rounded teachers who are competent in their respective fields, could teach subjects in both Bahasa Malaysia and English, producing very good results, provided that politics and religion are kept out of education.
Those who are calling for the re-introduction of English-medium schools are wrong if they think these schools will automatically produce results similar to the English-medium schools of the 50s and 60s.
This will not happen unless the new English-medium schools are “mirror images” of the culture, competency, dedication and discipline of the English-medium schools of the 50s and 60s.
Without all these qualities that made the English-medium schools of the 50s and 60s the choice of most parents, the new-generation English-medium schools, even with all the technology and whatnot, will not compare with those of the 50s and 60s.
And then what?
Education is not for politicians to play poker with, nor is it for religionists to change the character and mission of the schools to suit their own agendas.
Ravinder Singh is an FMT reader.
Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.