Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

ROS LBoard 1

Our love affair with cars can be deadly

September 27, 2014

According to a WHO report, Malaysia has the highest deaths on the road compared to any other nation in the world.


By Liew Chin Tong

cars deadlyIt seems that the government, the banks, the housing developers and the middle class are all in love with the automobile culture. The problem is, the ubiquitous existence of motorcycles and the world’s highest per capita road deaths are clear signs of public policy failure.

A case which happened when I was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Bukit Bendera in 2008 continues to remind me of the human cost and psychological pain of road deaths.

I was seated between two families at my service centre in an attempt to bring some emotional closure: one lost a motorcyclist son to a road accident, the other one came with a son whose car accidentally killed the former’s son. The three-hour session was emotionally wrenching. I have since visited many other motorcycle accident victims who have been left dead or injured.

As of December 31 2013, there were 11.03 million registered motorcycles and 10.48 million private cars. If commercial vehicles were included, Malaysia has a total of 23.71 million registered vehicles.

Malaysia’s private car ownership level exceeds that of wealthier Western European countries and is approaching the level of United States, Australia and Canada; huge countries with a much longer history of car culture.

Traffic congestion in Malaysia is no longer confined to capital cities. Even small towns like Kluang – of which I am now the elected representative – are often congested as the number of private cars grow exponentially. Last year, a total number of 655,793 new cars were registered, of which 576,657 were privately owned with the balance commercially owned.

Nationally, there was an increase of 35 per cent in registered vehicles between 2007 and 2012. In the same five-year period, registered vehicles in Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur increased by 42 per cent. At the same time, the presence of the even larger number of registered motorcycles indicates that the car culture in Malaysia is not serving the transport needs of the poorer segment of the nation.

According to the World Health Organisation’s Road Safety Report 2013, Malaysia has the highest deaths on the road per 100,000 population in the world. (India:18.9; Russia: 18.6; China: 20.5; Malaysia: 25). Motorcyclists made up 60% of deaths on the road.

There is a love affair with cars in the minds of policymakers and a car-related industry-complex.

The Malaysian government subsidises fuel and funds the construction of roads and highways but public transport is supposed to be “user-paid”. The government cannot yet fathom the idea that public transport should be funded by the public sector.

Until very recently, public transport licenses were treated as a policy tool to implement the New Economic Policy but often become a hotbed for cronyism.

Since Dr. Mahathir Mohamad came into power in 1981, the government has been a “car dealer par excellence”. There is a National Automotive Policy but there isn’t a National Public Transport Policy. With the number of cars that the National Automotive Policy wishes to produce annually (1 million units), all roads will just become parking spaces as cars won’t be able to move much.

“Demand management” is never in the lexicon; it is all about supply of roads and highway capacity which sees the construction lobby thrive on building one highway after another to feed the automobile culture.

When public transport is mooted, the vendors capture it very quickly to turn it into massive construction contracts such as the Klang Valley MRT. No one seriously looks at buses as an option.

The banking sector is ever eager to provide loans for automotive purchases (deemed “safe”, “conservative”, “good” asset-based lending), which I will deal with in a separate article.

A developer lobby, many of them owned by government-linked corporations (GLCs) and government-linked investment corporations (GLICs), is too eager to sprawl the cities with greenfield development that can only exist with cheap fuels, highways, and an automobile culture.

No one looks at buses as a serious option because of the love affair with cars and also because it doesn’t provide the construction lobby with as much money as the big toys like the MRT and LRT, which alone won’t solve the public transport demands without a proper feeder bus system.

It’s time for us to think beyond the car culture and move beyond the construction lobby when it comes to public transport construction. But to dismantle the car-related industry-complex needs political will – which is sorely lacking at this moment.

Liew Chin Tong is the DAP Political Education Director and the MP for Kluang.


Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.