Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

Sports Home LBoard

Canada accuse referee after football defeat

August 8, 2012

LONDON:  Canada’s beaten soccer players accused Norwegian referee Christiana Pedersen of bias towards the United States after their dramatic 4-3 extra-time defeat in their Olympic women’s soccer semi-final on Monday.

In a rare move, Pedersen penalised Canada goalkeeper Erin McLeod for holding the ball too long after making a save in the 80th minute, awarding the US. an indirect free kick in the penalty area.

The law states the keeper should release the ball after six seconds, but it is hardly ever applied in either men’s or women’s soccer.

While that decision appeared to Canada’s team to be harsh, Pedersen then awarded the US. a penalty resulting from Megan Rapinoe’s free kick. The ball struck the elbow of Canada’s Marie-Eve Nault with the player turning away.

The referee was not available to comment but Rune Pedersen, the head of refereeing for the Norwegian FA and a former World Cup referee came to her defence.

“The semi-final was intense and demanding. There were many battles, but the referee was in control all the time. Christiana was very close to the play.

“There were two difficult decisions in the match – an indirect free kick to the United States with a subsequent penalty for handball. Those decisions were tough to make and it showed Christiana was not afraid to do what she thought was right. We hope FIFA supports her in these decisions.”

FIFA, world soccer’s governing body said in a statement: “The Disciplinary Committee is currently analysing incidents that occurred after the conclusion of the match (between Canada and the US.).

“Further information will be provided only after the committee are in possession of all the elements of the case.”

Earlier, FIFA said it would not comment on the specific allegations made by the Canadians, adding: “In any case, the referee’s decision is always final.”

Canada’s coach John Herdman initially shied away from the controversy but then added: “She (the referee) has got to live with that. We will move on from this. I wonder if she will be able to.”

McLeod told reporters: “The referee said I had the ball for 10 seconds. She obviously counted the time I was on the ground with the ball. Once I got to my feet I calculate I only had the ball for five seconds.

“We feel like we got robbed in this game. The referee was very one-sided. I have never known this to happen before in a game, referees never make this kind of decision.”

Skipper Christine Sinclair, who scored all three of Canada’s goals, added: “When she gave the penalty, she giggled and said nothing, Classy!

“In an important match it’s a disappointment the referee had such an impact on it. We feel cheated.”

Canada will meet France for the bronze medal on Thursday but Sinclair added: “Maybe the referee will wear a Canadian jersey for this game.”

Canada had already felt hard done by at these Games when equestrian rider Tiffany Foster was disqualified before the team show jumping final on Sunday because of hypersensitivity in her horse’s front leg, a decision team captain Eric Lamaze called “a complete miscarriage of justice”.

The soccer match was as dramatic as the scoreline suggests with the winning header from US. striker Alex Morgan coming three minutes into added time at the end of extra time.

Canada led three times thanks to Sinclair’s goals with the US equalising each time, twice through Rapinoe and once from Abby Wambach’s contentious penalty which took the game into extra time.

Thursday’s gold medal match is against Japan at Wembley where the US. will aim to win their third successive Olympic title against the team that beat them on penalties in last year’s World Cup final. .



Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.