Storify Feed Feedburner Facebook Twitter Flickr Youtube

ROS Lboard

Australia slams ‘sick joke’ cigarette packs

September 12, 2012
SYDNEY: Australia slammed as a “sick joke” today new cigarette packs on sale as part of the national phase-in to plain packaging which play on drab branding and claim it’s “what’s on the inside that counts.”

Tobacco products in Australia will have to be sold in drab, uniform khaki packaging with graphic health warnings from December 1 under a new anti-smoking policy upheld last month by the nation’s highest court.

In order to meet the shelf deadline products must be manufactured in plain packets from October 1 and Imperial Tobacco rolled out one last branded packet today which attracted the ire of Health Minister Tanya Plibersek.

The new box shows the Peter Stuyvesant brand ripped at one corner to reveal the new drab-look box and comes with information to customers about the coming changes claiming “it’s what’s on the inside that counts.”

“We’re going plain early because we know Peter Stuyvesant will continue to live on inside,” Imperial’s advertising says.

Plibersek condemned the interim packets as a “the ultimate sick joke from big tobacco” and said they exposed the falseness of industry complaints that they would not be able to meet the December deadline.

“That packaging at the moment is not illegal but I can tell you it’s unprincipled. The tobacco companies are using their packs to have a last desperate gasp at promoting their brand,” the health minister said.

“And yes, they’re right, it’s what’s in the pack that counts, and what we used to call them when I was a kid was cancer sticks.”

A spokeswoman for Imperial said the packaging was “a mechanism to provide factual information about upcoming legislative changes to adult consumers of the Peter Stuyvesant brand of cigarettes.

“It is also important to inform our adult consumers that the product itself will remain unchanged,” the spokeswoman told AFP.

Tobacco firms failed in their attempt to have plain packaging struck down by the High Court of Australia, but the policy is still being challenged at the World Trade Organization and in an investment treaty lawsuit filed by Philip Morris Asia in Hong Kong.

- AFP


Comments

Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.

Comments