Amid Dana debacle, Islamic finance seeks safeguards against illegality claims

dana-gasSYDNEY/KUALA LUMPUR: The Islamic finance industry is seeking ways to safeguard deals against challenges to their religious permissibility, after a case in the United Arab Emirates raised the risk that issuers of Islamic bonds could refuse to redeem them after such a challenge.

Bankers and lawyers say several mechanisms, new and old, could address the problem, though it may be impossible to remove the risk entirely.

Legal provisions in contracts for financial instruments could prevent their sharia-compliance from being questioned after they are issued. Investors may also screen scholars who certify instruments as sharia-compliant more carefully, and pay more attention to what mechanisms, such as courts, exist to rule on potential disputes.

Last month, Sharjah-based Dana Gas declared it would not make payments on US$700 million of sukuk maturing this October because Islamic finance standards had changed since the instruments were issued four years ago.

The change in standards meant the instruments were no longer sharia-compliant and had become “unlawful” in the United Arab Emirates, Dana argued.

This raised concern across the Islamic finance industry that more companies could avoid redeeming sukuk by adopting the same argument as Dana. The outcome of the Dana case, which is being fought in British and UAE courts, could hurt liquidity and growth in the global sukuk market, Moody’s said.

To try to avoid similar cases in future, investors may demand more detailed and restrictive language in sukuk documentation. Such language already exists for some sukuk, but it is not used consistently and is not standardised.

“We foresee sukuk investors increasingly demanding sharia assurances which could include a sharia undertaking in the form of an explicit waiver of any defence of non-compliance,” said Mohammad Hasif Murad, investment manager at Aberdeen Islamic Asset Management in Malaysia.

Some issuers in Indonesia go further by stipulating that if their sukuk cease to be sharia-compliant, they will be declared in default, mature immediately and become repayable to investors.

Sukuk issued by Maybank Indonesia, BRI Syariah and Bank Jambi include such clauses, according to Fitch Ratings. They all used an investment management partnership structure known as mudaraba, the same format employed by Dana.

But early redemption is not fundamentally desirable for issuers or investors, which may limit wide use of such clauses in the Gulf region, said a Dubai-based partner of an international law firm.

Also, such clauses may not suffice against an issuer in financial distress seeking to force a restructuring aggressively or delay repayment, said the lawyer.

“This is part of the risk that investors run in our region. Such risk already tends to be priced into instruments issued out of the Middle East.”


Investors may therefore cast a more watchful eye on the groups of scholars who provide sharia endorsements for sukuk.

“With this case, we will be more stringent when looking at what are the pledges made, who are the sharia councils,” said Heddy Humaizi Hussain, director of institutional sales and marketing at Kuala Lumpur-based financial firm Saturna.

At present, sukuk issuers generally choose the scholars who certify their instruments. Some analysts think that model could eventually change under pressure from investors, if that is necessary to maintain the credibility of Islamic finance.

Issuers could be required to have an independent sharia board that answers to directors and shareholders rather than to management, said Sheikh Yusuf Talal DeLorenzo, a scholar with over three decades of experience in Islamic finance.

“Certainly in Muslim-majority jurisdictions this should be the case, whether it’s an airport authority, or a shipbuilder, or a real estate developer,” he said.

Malaysia has succeeded in limiting disputes over sharia compliance partly because it has country-level sharia boards within its central bank and capital markets regulator. These boards tend to create a national consensus on standards.

In May, the UAE approved the formation of a high sharia authority for Islamic banking and finance, which is expected to set rules and a general framework for Islamic finance governance and the issuance of sharia rulings.

It is not yet known if the board will have influence over the Dana case. But it could be instrumental in restoring confidence in the UAE market, improving liquidity and reducing costs, Dubai consultancy Acreditus said in a research note.

“The Dana restructuring will be a critical and important test for the Board,” it predicted.