Couple charged with maid’s death seek review of 20-year jail term

Fong Kong Meng and his wife, Teoh Ching Yen, were sentenced on a reduced charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

PUTRAJAYA: An elderly couple convicted of causing the death of their Indonesian maid have claimed that they were wrongly sentenced to 20 years’ jail by the Federal Court.

Lawyer Gopal Sri Ram submitted before the Federal Court’s five-man bench that the wrong provision was applied by the Federal Court’s earlier bench to convict and sentence Fong Kong Meng and his wife, Teoh Ching Yen, for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

He said the appropriate sentence would be under section 304 (b) of the Penal Code, which provided a maximum 10 years’ jail term and not under section 304 (a) of the Penal Code, which was punishable with 30 years’ jail.

“The jail sentence is illegal and contrary to the law,” said Sri Ram, adding that the jail term had caused injustice to the couple.

Sri Ram, who was assisted by counsel Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, said his clients’ case fell under section 304 (b) as their action in committing the offence was done without any intention to cause death.

He said the prosecution had relied on Section 300 (d) of the Penal Code to prove their case for murder and the High Court had also relied on the same section when sentencing the couple to death for murder.

Section 300 (d) applies to cases where the accused persons were shown not to possess the intention to cause specific bodily injury leading to death.

The couple filed an application to review the decision of the Federal Court on April 4 last year, and for an order that their conviction and sentence under section 304 (a) be set aside and substituted with a sentence under section 304 (b) of the Penal Code.

Fong, 63, a former wiring consultant, and Teoh, 61, a housewife, were initially convicted and sentenced to death by the High Court for the murder of Isti Komariah, 26, at a house on Jalan SS 2/6, Sea Park in Petaling Jaya, between May 14, 2010, and June 5, 2011.

The Court of Appeal had upheld the High Court’s decision.

Last year, the Federal Court’s five-man bench amended the charge to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 (a) and sentenced them to 20 years’ jail, to run from the date they were remanded on June 5, 2011.

In today’s proceedings, deputy public prosecutor Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi argued that application for review under Rule 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995 is only applicable in rare and special circumstances and the applicants did not meet the threshold requirement.

She said the sentence meted out on Fong and Teoh was according to the law.

Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak David Wong Dak Wah, who chaired the bench, deferred the court’s decision to a date yet to be fixed.