BNM as adviser to the govt cannot play it cool

Mohammad-Ibrahim

By Ramon Navaratnam

New Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) Governor Mohammad Ibrahim played it cool, in his smooth presentation of the second Quarter BNM Report 2016 last week.

He was understandably upbeat in trying to encourage confidence in Malaysia’s economic performance and outlook.

But he could also have stoutly alerted the Government to be more wary of the external headwinds as well as the internal threats to our economic growth and stability. Hopefully, he will soon set a new tone and leadership as the new Governor.

Our socio, economic and political image abroad, arising from the US Department of Justice civil suits to seize assets purchased with funds embezzled from 1MDB, are very serious indeed. Yet, BNM has treated this serious issue rather sensitively and over cautiously.

However, our people want to know the real truth and so they expect stronger investigations, especially from BNM, into these widespread concerns over possible financial misdeeds?

The world is watching and foreign investment and capital outflows and even the brain drain, could be further adversely aggravated, if we are seen to take a soft stance.

Playing it cool and dismissing the allegations lightly will not inspire confidence in our public reports that our economic fundamentals and public institutions are strong and that the Malaysian economy is continuing to be resilient.

Actually, our economic growth has been declining to 4 per cent this second quarter from 4.2 per cent in the 1st quarter and 5.7 per cent in the 1st quarter of 2015.

It is more likely that our economy will slide further, unless the Government’s Budget for next year primes much more expenditure to push economic growth. But this may not be possible for the following reason:

Triple Deficits

There is a strong likelihood that we are heading towards a triple deficit economy, having to contend with the current Budget deficit, the likely balance of payments current account deficit and the present debt limitations or debt deficit.

Hence, there are three likely threats to the economy, and it is hoped that BNM will highlight how the Government should handle this threat of a triple deficit, in its next report.

It should also advise the Government, as its constitutional duty, to adopt important and urgent policy measures and to ensure more effective implementation that will further strengthen the economy to combat these likely triple deficits.

What are the threats that the Government and BNM must address?

1. Inflation is a major problem and has not been adequately dealt with. Food constitutes a sizeable part in calculating the rising cost of living. Have we got an anti-inflationary plan to counter rising prices, particularly in our basic needs, especially food, transport and housing?

If so, please let the people know the specific targets and then publicise the achievements. The people will then be consoled that these vital issues are not being played down or worse still, swept under the carpet?

2. Unemployment, low productivity and low income, especially among new school and university graduates, is now worsening. This could undermine social stability. Yet, not much is mentioned about what plans are in place to train them to beat unemployment, low productivity and low income problems.

If the Government is slow to share their plans to counter unemployment, low productivity and low income, then BNM, as the advisor to the Government, could perform a more active or hotter role, rather than playing it comfortably cool.

3. The triple deficits in the Budget, possibly in the balance of payments current account and the debt deficit as well, can be tackled more effectively, if our economy is made more competitive.

But our policies continue to be governed by the old NEP policies of preference for Government agencies like the GLCs. There is still public sector predominance in the alienation of land for vital agriculture and food production, expanding business and investment, and in the award of big infrastructure contracts.

Thus, the private sector, both local and foreign, feel constrained in its participation and contributions to economic growth, employment and rising incomes.

With that, the natural and national drive to improve the well being of the Rakyat can be badly inhibited. The rich are thus getting richer and the poor are becoming relatively poorer. What plans have we got to narrow the gaps soon enough? Will Budget 2017 introduce measures to narrow the income gaps?

4. The triple threats or deficits in the Budget, balance of payments and the national debt, can cause the economy to decline as Tun Musa Hitam has courageously claimed – for other significant reasons as well.

We cannot therefore afford to play it cool, when socio-economic and political problems are seriously heating up.

We cannot ignore the fact that the socio-economic, religious, racial and political problems, are all inter-related and can hold back our national development and progress.

We cannot wait for a so-called tipping point. We have to anticipate problems and move faster to counter rising problems.

5. Given our short term constrains to effectively manage our likely triple deficits, we have to show greater priority in the doable policies in the short term. They should be, to drastically cut down corruption, cronyism and Government expenditure wastage, as indicted by the Auditor-General’s constant annual reminders.

But are we acting fast and efficiently enough to solve these long-standing and festering issues? Many seriously doubt it. In the meantime, the economy, and especially the poor Malaysians, continue to suffer most .

Conclusion

Given the domestic and external headwinds and threats to our national growth, our further development and our progress, we have to recognise the need for a sense of urgency, to adopt new policies and techniques to promote greater national resilience. We cannot take it easy or cooly and take any future progress, for granted.

With the General Election looming large on the horizon, and the likelihood of it being sooner rather than later, even as early as next year, with the international and domestic uncertainties steadily growing larger, we cannot afford to be cool, lest we become too complacent.

Tougher policy decisions by the Government and BNM have to be taken soon, to counter the national threats facing the economy, some of which are mentioned above.

If we play it too cool, we can face a rising pool of deeper problems and experience more decline. Then it may be too late to arrest the possible slide.

Hence, we have to work towards solving our problems or risk failing in our collective mission to protect and sustain the success of our country’s future.

Let’s all be more alert and rise to better serve our beloved country, with greater integrity, truth, righteousness and justice for all.

Ramon Navaratnam is the Chairman Asli Center of Public Policy Studies

With a firm belief in freedom of expression and without prejudice, FMT tries its best to share reliable content from third parties. Such articles are strictly the writer’s personal opinion. FMT does not necessarily endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider.