PH choosing to govern by procrastination

Despite our bloated civil service that continues to bleed our annual budget dry, the Pakatan Harapan government continues to procrastinate in solving the nation’s problems by forming new committees, task forces or advisers, all of which will further bleed the national coffers.

Special body to deal with river pollution

The deepening water crisis, caused in part by our highly-polluted rivers, has led to the recent proposal by the National Water Services Commission (SPAN) chairman Charles Santiago that we need a special body to coordinate the various agencies that seem helpless in dealing with this problem.

Meanwhile, what is expected of the many state-level and municipal-level agencies dealing with water management, forest management, environmental protection and enforcement?

Task force on enforced disappearances

The government has procrastinated in solving the enforced disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh and activist Amri Che Mat by forming a task force when the home minister and the prime minister should be demanding answers from the inspector-general of police.

After all, the prime minister is not known to suffer fools.

RCI on Wang Kelian

Police work is all that is needed to get to the bottom of the Wang Kelian mass graves at the Thai border. The home minister is responsible for cracking the whip to ensure the police are professional in finding out who the human traffickers are and to bring them to book, like the Thai police have done.

If our police and enforcement agencies have been tardy or, worse, been accomplices in the crime, the home minister must act.

Forming yet another royal commission of inquiry is not going to solve these crimes.

Task force on UEC

The government has procrastinated over the recognition of the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) of the Independent Chinese Secondary Schools (promised in the 14th general election manifesto) by forming a task force to look into the matter.

The terms of reference of this task force are unclear and, worse, is the Cabinet bound by the recommendations of this task force?

If it is not, the formation of this task force is the most cynical action yet by the Pakatan Harapan government to procrastinate on an issue it is unwilling to solve.

Ministers in the PM’s Department

The Najib Razak administration was criticised by Pakatan Harapan for having 10 ministers in the PM’s Department. There is supposed to be more than 43,000 staff in the PM’s Office when there are only some 2,000 in the White House.

With the droves of officials leaving the Donald Trump administration, that figure has probably gone down further. Yet, we have not seen any significant change to our “Cabinet within the Cabinet”.

The prime minister even created a new economic affairs ministry for Mohamed Azmin Ali, without justifying why this post is necessary and why it is necessary to put this new minister in charge of the biggest government-linked companies (GLCs) in the country when they were formerly under the finance ministry.

For a start, we could begin the long-delayed process of local government elections by electing mayors to the three federal territories and do away with the FT ministry altogether.

Special advisers to ministers

As if the Cabinet salaries are not burdensome enough, this “special adviser to the minister” is a new post that even the old Najib regime did not dream up.

It looks like another convenient scheme to appoint PH’s unemployed politicians.

Politicians holding posts in GLCs

This was a BN practice of blatant patronage and cronyism that PH had vowed to eradicate in their GE14 manifesto because it is unethical and unprofessional.

Alas, they did not expect to win, did they? So, if they didn’t expect to win, does it mean that they are expected to carry on with the old BN practice?

Council of Eminent Persons (CEP)

Now that the prime minister has made known his economic plan, notably the third national car and privatisation of GLCs, including Khazanah, one wonders what the function of the CEP was intended to be.

We know that the CEP chairman, Daim Zainuddin, was sent to China to negotiate the East Cost Rail Link (ECRL) deal although his locus standi on such a mission was questionable. Why wasn’t a minister sent instead?

And since the CEP report is under wraps (under the Official Secrets Act), are we to assume that the third national car and the privatisation of Khazanah and other GLCs are recommendations by the CEP? If not, what was the function of the CEP? Was it just a camouflage to employ Daim as the PM’s fixer?

Procrastination is the thief of time and our resources

Procrastination is the thief of time. And when it comes to governing a country in the 21st century, such procrastination by appointing advisers, committees, task forces, etc, is also costly.

They will bleed our national coffers even more and contribute only to our budget deficit.

This is the hypocrisy of the PH government’s apparent concern for the ballooning national debt. But it is not the budget deficit the PH government needs to worry about.

The trust deficit among the people, especially over the issues of enforced disappearances, recognition of the UEC, politicians in GLCs, etc, will be fatal for their credibility in the future.

Kua Kia Soong is the adviser to Suaram.

The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.