Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

ROS LBoard 1

Where was your due diligence, Nazir?

April 1, 2016

“How does one champion reform having been part of the problem in the first place?”


NazirBy Rahim Zainuddin

Nazir Razak’s admission to the Wall Street Journal that he was involved in the disbursement of funds prior to the 2013 General Election on behalf of his brother, Prime Minister Najib Razak, has left me bemused.

How does one champion reform having been part of the problem in the first place?

With this damning revelation, all the good vibes attributed to this highly-respected banker have evaporated.

All his comparisons of two prime ministers, past and present, father and son, have come to nought.

Every one of his proposals for transparency and accountability have rung hollow.

It does not matter that the sum which passed through his hands was a meagre US$7 million compared with the US$1 billion handled by the prime minister.

Neither does it matter that he did not take a single sen for himself.

Nazir’s explanation that he “believed” the money to have originated from donations received from Malaysian corporations and individuals and that he “had no knowledge whatsoever that these funds may have originated from any other source(s)” is unworthy of the prominent banker he is cast as.

Where was his due diligence on the subject?

Where was his moral compass?

Malaysians deserve a better answer.

Rahim Zainuddin is an FMT reader

With a firm belief in freedom of expression and without prejudice, FMT tries its best to share reliable content from third parties. Such articles are strictly the writer’s personal opinion. FMT does not necessarily endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider.


Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.