
Justice Stephen Chung made the ruling after finding that the prosecution had succeeded in establishing a prima facie case against 19 of the accused compromising of 16 Filipinos, including a woman, and three local men.
The court fixed three weeks beginning February 22 for trial.
Nine of the 16 Filipinos ordered to enter their defence were alleged to have waged a war against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, an offence that carries the death penalty.
They are Atik Hussin Abu Bakar, Basad H Manuel, Ismail Yasin, Virgilio Nemar Patulada alias Mohammad Alam Patulada, Salib Akhmad Emali, Al Wazir Osman alias Abdul, Tani Lahaddahi, Julham Rashid and Datu Amirbahar Hushin Kiram.
They, together with six other accused, also face life imprisonment and a fine if found guilty on another charge of being members of a terrorist group.
The other six accused of being members of a terrorist group are Lin Mad Salleh, Holland Kalbi, Habil Suhaili, Timhar Hadir, Aiman Radie and a local man named Abd Hadi Mawan.
The sole Filipina in the case, Norhaida Ibnahi, was ordered to enter her defence for allegedly wilfully harbouring individuals she knew to be members of a terrorist group.
The offence is punishable by 20 years to life imprisonment and a fine, or both, if found guilty.
Chung acquitted and discharged two other local men and a Filipino of waging war and being members of a terrorist group, but ordered them to enter their defence after they pleaded not guilty to a new charge.
One Filipino man, Basil Samiul, and one of the local men, Mohamad Ali Ahmad, were charged with soliciting or giving support to a terrorist group.
The new charge against the two men was made after Chung found that the prosecution had shown evidence that they had solicited or given support to a terrorist group, an offence punishable by life imprisonment or a fine.
Chung also amended the charge against local Pabblo Alie to soliciting a terrorist group by providing aid, an offence punishable by up to 30 years imprisonment and a fine.
He pleaded not guilty and the judge ordered him to enter his defence.
All the offences were allegedly committed between February 12 and April 10, 2013 in Lahad Datu, Beluran and Semporna.
Meanwhile, Chung ordered 11 others, whom he acquitted and discharged of the charges brought against them, to be referred to the Immigration Department for deportation.
However, deputy public prosecutor Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar requested that they be remanded in prison under Section 30(1) of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma) pending a notice of appeal to be filed by the prosecution against their acquittal.
Chung granted the request after the counsel for all parties did not object to it.
The prosecution, led by Mohd Dusuki and assisted by deputy public prosecutor Jamil Aripin, had produced 166 witnesses in a joint hearing of the 30 accused which spanned 239 days within the period between January 6, 2014 to January 5 this year at the Sabah Prison Department.
Counsel N Sivananthan was appointed by the Philippine government to represent the Filipinos, while lawyers Abdul Gani Zelika represented Abd Hadi, Putli Noor Asikin Datu Gulam represented Pabblo and a team led by lawyer Kamaruddin Mohamad Chinki represented Mohamad Ali.
Tight security was mounted at the Sabah Prison Department, where the High Court sat. The area was secured by prison guards and police personnel wearing combat uniforms from as early as 6 am.
The road leading to the prison complex was also blocked by police as far as 20m on both sides.
The courtroom was also swarming with police from the special branch and a team wearing bulletproof vests bearing the word ‘POLICE’.
– BERNAMA