Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

ROS LBoard 1

Economist foresees doom for Melaka Gateway

 | May 5, 2017

Funding issues threaten all projects led by China-based companies, says Hoo Ke Ping.

Hoo-Ke-PingKUALA LUMPUR: An economist has voiced concern that the Melaka Gateway project may not materialise due to China’s strict capital controls.

In an interview with FMT, Hoo Ke Ping said funding issues were in fact threatening all Malaysian projects led by companies based in China.

The RM43 billion Melaka Gateway project, seen as an attempt to compete with Singapore, features a deep-sea port to be built by 2019 on Pulau Melaka off the coast of Melaka. There’ll also be a cruise terminal and a waterfront district with hotels and a giant observation wheel.

“I foresee that many Chinese-led mega projects won’t materialise because Beijing’s capital controls mean that Chinese companies, be they state-owned or private, will face severe restrictions in investing money overseas.

“Recently, Beijing started vetting transfers above US$5 million out of China,” he noted. “Last year, before the vetting, the threshold was US$50 million.”

Even if the Melaka Gateway project materialised, he said, it would be difficult for the project’s deep sea port to be viable.

“Presently, we already have Port Klang, while the Carey Island port project, which is backed by some really big players, is also massive.”

He said these ports were much bigger than Melaka Gateway’s port but even then would be dwarfed by Singapore’s Tuas port.

“The new Tuas port is a mega port which can easily handle four times the capacity of all Malaysian ports combined,” he added. “Moreover, Singapore’s reputation for efficiency is well known.”

Recently, former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad described the Melaka Gateway project as “unnecessary”, saying there were enough ports in the country.

China’s port project in Malacca under scrutiny



Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.