Facebook Twitter Google Plus Vimeo Youtube Feed Feedburner

ROS LBoard 1

How black market tobacco fuels terrorism

October 5, 2017

Illicit cigarettes are now second only to the heroin trade in helping fund some of the Taliban militias.



By David M Luna

It’s time to focus the world’s attention on a smuggling enterprise that helps underwrite North Korea’s nukes and Taliban terror.

Where does North Korea, whose gross domestic product is less than that of some US cities, get the money to fund its nuclear efforts? Kim Jong Un and his regime obtain much of their money from a vast series of criminal enterprises that trade in everything, from goods made by forced labour to counterfeit currency to narcotics. And like many insurgent groups and criminal organisations worldwide, Jong Un and his circle also traffic in illegal tobacco.

That may sound like something of an anticlimax. But smuggling tobacco products so they may be sold without the high taxes and tariffs that prevail in many countries is big business: globally, tens of billions of dollars a year.

Compared to narcotics trafficking, it is a high reward, low-risk enterprise. A shipping container loaded with smuggled tobacco can be obtained for US$100,000 and resold for US$2 million, with criminal penalties paling in comparison to the lengthy prison terms handed down to drug traffickers.

During my tenure at the US State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, we released a 2015 interagency report that underscored how illicit tobacco funds bad actors and “fuels transnational crime, corruption, and terrorism”.

Through numerous open source reports, we know that 15 of the world’s leading terrorist groups regularly rely on illicit cigarettes for funding, including al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hezbollah and Hamas. Illicit cigarettes are now second only to the heroin trade in helping fund some of the Taliban militias. Put simply: illicit tobacco flows threaten national security.

Several recent moves by congress have begun to raise awareness of the dangers. The senate’s 2018 National Defence Authorisation Act includes a provision, championed by Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), that directs the Pentagon to report on its efforts to combat the trafficking of drugs, people, weapons, antiquities, and tobacco.

In July, Senators Marco Rubio (R-Fla) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), introduced legislation meant to improve our ability to combat Hezbollah; among other things, it would require a comprehensive federal examination of the illicit tobacco trafficking networks used by that group and other foreign terrorist organisations to finance their operations.

Also last month, the US Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe held a hearing to examine the threats posed by black market tobacco. Its chairman, Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss), stressed that the “ongoing illicit trade helps fund terrorist activities, foster corruption, and undermine the rule of law”.

At the hearing, Dr Louise Shelley, who runs George Mason University’s Terrorism, Transnational Crime and Corruption Center, testified that one of the terrorists who killed the cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo was involved in the illegal sale of cigarettes.

What we need now is better coordination of existing efforts around the world, within the US government, and even with private industry. Better cooperation should allow us to more effectively implement “whole-of-government” strategies, execute multi-disciplinary approaches, coordinate enforcement across borders and develop enduring impact solutions.

First, it is imperative that global action on countering illicit trade is elevated within critical organisations, including the United Nations, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the World Customs Organisation and Interpol.

Similarly, we need to ensure that blocs such as the European Union, the Organisation of American States, the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum, the Gulf Cooperation Council, and others, make the fight against illicit trade a greater priority.

At a national level, governments should begin folding illicit trade strategies to combat illegal tobacco and other illicit commodities into their broader security policy and legislative agendas that help to target their harmful effects on their economies and communities alike.

Also crucial: more dynamic cross-sectoral, cross-industry partnerships can be decisive to protect the integrity of our markets, the security of the legitimate global supply chain, and the health and safety of our people. These collective action-oriented coalitions are a win-win for all market stakeholders.

Finally, we must elevate the fight against illicit trade by targeting the culture of impunity behind the webs of corruption and criminality across the global illegal economy. We must accelerate cross-border intelligence-led policing to disrupt and dismantle the illicit trafficking networks that are fuelling today’s global insecurity, and confiscate their criminally derived profits from illegal tobacco and other illicit commodities.

By smartly targeting the illicit activities of North Korea and other threat networks, we can curtail the financing that enables these criminal regimes to exist, better safeguard our security and world order, and help to win the peace.

David M Luna is CEO and president of Luna Global Networks & Convergence Strategies LLC and the departing chair of the OECD Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade. He is the former senior director for National Security and Diplomacy, Anti-Crime Programs, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement (INL) Affairs at the US Department of State.

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.


Readers are required to have a valid Facebook account to comment on this story. We welcome your opinions to allow a healthy debate. We want our readers to be responsible while commenting and to consider how their views could be received by others. Please be polite and do not use swear words or crude or sexual language or defamatory words. FMT also holds the right to remove comments that violate the letter or spirit of the general commenting rules.

The views expressed in the contents are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.