By T K Chua

Much has been said about Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s foray into opposition politics. This includes pundits from across the causeway claiming that Mahathir would not make a difference in the opposition’s push to unseat Umno/BN from power.

Here at home, numerous views have been expressed, with some accusing Mahathir of being the grandfather of all ills besetting the country today.

Some have said that Mahathir should apologise, and not only that, he must state clearly what he is apologising for.

Some have claimed that Mahathir is a double-edged sword. He may gain some votes for the opposition but at the same time, he may drive away many of his detractors, especially the non-Malays.

Put simply, they say that Mahathir is least qualified to talk and fight for reforms and good governance.

I find most views expressed nowadays, even by research institutes, are nothing more than personal inclinations and opinions. How useful do such views, as expressed above, help us to enhance our understanding of the political situation in the country?

So is Mahathir a service or disservice to the opposition? It is so easy to say he is a double-edged sword, but which side of the sword is sharper? Do we know?

If Mahathir is of no help, why is everybody, including those in Umno and BN, talking about him endlessly? If Mahathir is insignificant or a disservice, why does the opposition coalition engage him and give him prominence?

The last time I checked, the opposition is not compelled to accept him. In fact, the opposition coalition can ditch him anytime if that is a better option for them.

Whatever mistakes Mahathir committed cannot be undone. At most, we can only draw a lesson from it. He has been out of power for nearly two decades.

Are we saying if Mahathir had committed grievous mistakes in the past, he is no longer qualified to help to alleviate the bigger mistakes prevailing now?

Look, the opposition has existed in this country when Mahathir was in government, out of government and now out of Umno.

The opposition is not beholden to Mahathir, but if he chooses to help, why are we creating so much fuss?

I have an inkling that Mahathir has, in fact, gained traction with Malaysians in general. He has the stature and the credentials to speak despite his chequered past. Without him, I think the opposition is dead in the water.

The vociferous attack on Mahathir is a sign that he is effective.

If ever Mahathir is reappointed PM, I don’t think he will amass power to himself like what he did in the 1980s and 1990s. First, time is not with him, and second, the Pakatan Harapan members of parliament and coalition partners will not allow it.

The fear of Mahathir by the pro-reformasi groups is really unwarranted. It is just for some to settle old scores, perhaps.

TK Chua is an FMT reader.

The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.