MACC chief Azam Baki said the case is now dependent on evidence and witnesses from abroad as the domestic phase of the investigation was over.

He added that the anti-graft agency would only decide on its next course of action after that, Berita Harian reported.

“Our investigation uncovered elements of wrongdoing, but further evidence from overseas is needed to strengthen our case,” said Azam.

Two days ago, White & Case denied any wrongdoing following reports that MACC had completed its investigation into the firm’s role in the 1MDB-PetroSaudi International Ltd deal.

It said it was unaware of any criminal investigation into the firm and “strenuously” denied any allegations of criminality regarding the matter.

Azam previously said the probe covered the preparation of documents suspected to contain false information, as well as misleading payment instructions that allegedly facilitated the disbursement of 1MDB-linked funds to unauthorised parties.

The investigation, conducted under the MACC Act 2009 and the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, also examined payments made to White & Case.

White & Case is facing a lawsuit filed by 1MDB in 2024, seeking US$1.83 billion and US$33 million in losses from White & Case, and Patrick Mahony, a director of PetroSaudi.

The fund alleges that White & Case assisted PetroSaudi in committing fraud and conspired to harm 1MDB while acting as its legal counsel.

The alleged misconduct relates to two corporate transactions – the 2009 joint venture with PetroSaudi and the 2010 restructuring of 1MDB’s stake in the joint venture – both of which 1MDB claims resulted in significant financial losses.