From the Penang Forum
The Penang Forum has repeatedly called for the cancellation of the Penang South Reclamation (PSR) project and we are heartened to hear a chorus of voices in support. The forum is a broad coalition of non-governmental organisations working towards local democracy and sustainable development in Penang.
While we may be concerned about many social and environmental issues at the national level, our focus is on improving policies, governance and public participation in Penang itself.
Responding to the global call for climate action, Penang Forum initiated a project in 2009 to promote public transport and reduce the need for private vehicle use. The Penang Transport Master Plan (PTMP) was a willing collaboration between the state government and civil society, and there is a mountain of documents to show for it.
The state then changed the plan to one that includes an LRT line, monorail lines and many highways, which is not cost-efficient while requiring massive hill cutting and land acquisition. We tried for the next few years to convince the Penang government to opt for a more integrated plan featuring “better, cheaper, faster” transport alternatives, but to no avail.
In 2015, the PSR project was introduced as the means of financing the high-budgeted transport plan. In the final agreement with the developers, “the means” – land reclamation – has become “the ends” unto itself. The primary justification for land reclamation is no longer PTMP but industrial expansion for the first phase of 1,200 acres.
Three simple questions not answered
Although it is steamrolling all objections, the state government has yet to answer Lim Mah Hui’s three easy questions, which we repeat here:
- Can the state justify its population projection for the three islands to reach 446,000 by 2030 as stated in the EIA report?
- Can the state explain how it will fund PTMP projects, which will cost billions, when its expected revenue from reclaiming half of Island A would probably be about RM600 million in seven to 10 years’ time?
- Can the state explain how the costs of the project have escalated from RM8 billion for two islands (totalling 3,530 acres or 1,428ha) in 2015 to RM7 billion for half an island (only 1,200 acres or 485ha) in 2021?
The economic risks of the project are enormous, but the environmental risks are even more shocking.
Reclaiming the three islands measuring 4,500 acres or 1,821 hectares would involve the dumping of about 190 million cubic metres of sand into the sea. If this is hard for ordinary folks to visualise, Consumers’ Association of Penang and Sahabat Alam Malaysia have likened it to dumping 76,000 Olympic-size swimming pools worth of material.
Scientist Kam Suan Pheng says it is equivalent to the total volume of earth from the hills of Penang Island, if they were to be scraped down to a depth of one metre.
Note that this infill will be deposited not into a barren wasteland, but into Penang’s best fisheries and prawn catching area, an environmentally sensitive area with coral reefs, turtle landing sites and a playground for dolphins.
Devastation in Perak too
Even with all the expensive eco-engineering, the residual impacts of large-scale reclamation like the lamentable loss of fisheries, the ruination of beaches and mudflats, severe coastal erosion and sedimentation will be problems that won’t go away.
The project is expected to generate 3.2 million tonnes of carbon annually (“18 nasihat” circular, Malaysian Physical Planning Council, 2019). Just to offset these carbon emissions, Penang would need a mind-boggling 147 million mature trees (based on 21.8kg of carbon sequestered per tree).
In addition, the project will require sand to be mined from 819.7km2 of seabed, probably in Perak waters. This will devastate the fisheries, reduce marine biodiversity, destroy the benthic zone, and dislodge carbon-sequestering marine sediments from the seabed, causing ocean acidification.
A landmark study published earlier this year in Nature, a British weekly scientific journal, showed that carbon emissions generated by worldwide bottom trawling exceeds that of global aviation.
The three artificial islands will be vulnerable to rising sea levels in the coming decades. When this was pointed out, the developers offered to raise the height of the reclaimed islands – meaning that even more marine sand, mined from an even larger area of seabed, generating even more carbon, will be required.
Out of 1,200 acres in the first phase of the project, 700 acres will be allocated to a “Green Tech Park” targeted at “high-value” electronic & electrical industry players. It is claimed that the project will create RM70 billion in foreign direct investment and 300,000 jobs worth RM100 billion over the next 30 years.
Our leaders like to think that the project will replicate and continue the success of the Bayan Lepas Free Industrial Zone (FIZ), which expanded into reclaimed land in the 1980s. But this is a false assumption based on comparisons that conveniently ignore the historical evolution of the FIZ and Penang’s place in the constantly changing global industrial ecosystem.
Room to grow on the mainland
The manufacturing sector is already well established in Seberang Perai, where there is room for further expansion and consolidation of an industrial corridor from Batu Kawan to Kulim Hi-Tech Park.
Conditions for Penang’s next-level industrial success will not depend on developable land alone – which is still in adequate supply in mainland Penang – but on Penang’s ability to draw and retain human talent. And Penang will fail to capture human talent if the state insists on putting all its eggs in the fake-island baskets rather than nurturing a well-planned and diversified economy.
The “Importance of ‘Reimagine, Recreate, Restore’” is the theme of World Environment Day (June 5), witnessing the launch of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
Penang leaders can rise to the occasion by addressing the long-standing problems of our scarred hills, scattered landfills of toxic and plastic waste along eroded coastlines, famously polluted rivers and vulnerability to recurrent flooding, as well as excessive levels of marine pollution in the Penang channel and north of the island.
World Oceans Day on June 8 focuses on “The Ocean: Life and Livelihoods”. The ocean supports fishing livelihoods and communities, as well as food industries downstream, so that Penangites can enjoy fresh seafood at affordable prices.
Instead of playing divide-and-rule with the fishermen and dumping sand into their ‘rice bowl’, the state should be empowering these fishermen as traditional custodians of the fisheries commons as well as supporting local community well-being and resilience.
Jobs for whom? Foreign workers?
During this Covid pandemic, many people are latching on to the project’s unsubstantiated promise of creating jobs.
During the initial four years, if not more, most of the designated jobs in the project’s implementation will be taken up by foreign workers involved in construction and dredging operations – assuredly benefitting the operators of the foreign workers’ hostel in the vicinity, but with questionable impact to the local fishing communities.
However, if the state were to fulfil its Penang 2030 promise of developing Seberang Perai by locating industrial expansion there, the state government can achieve a win-win situation – creating tens of thousands of new jobs in construction, manufacturing and service industries, and still retaining the livelihoods of the Teluk Kumbar fishermen, safeguarding Penang’s food security and conserving the healthy biodiversity of our coastal ecosystem.
Instead of climate action, the state government and their developer partners have expended all possible efforts towards green marketing for this reclamation project: for example, organising an international masterplan design competition with the winning entry ironically themed “BiodiverCity”, and taking out paid advertorials in newspapers extolling the supposedly green principles of the project.
Blatant wholesale ecocide
The state also boasts about its plan for the project to incorporate some renewable energy, water recycling, fancy architecture and decent landscaping. But would this be enough to make it green and sustainable? Or is the project’s bright green packaging rather hollow, shallow and a gross misrepresentation of its ecological balance sheet?
The Penang chief minister is in favour of banning drinking straws because it contributes to marine litter. He reportedly said: “This policy by the government is for Penang and Mother Earth.”
Yet, at the same time he is pushing the ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’ PSR project, which in fact involves nothing less than a deliberately and carefully planned, blatant, wholesale ecocide.
Enough of this doublespeak. It is not cool to try to pull the wool over the people’s eyes about something as calamitous as large-scale reclamation. It is not instructive to the younger generation, who are tired of adult hypocrisy and fearful for their future.
Greenwashing on such a grand scale is just a shameless smokescreen for a private-led development which will ultimately bring hugely harmful climate and environmental impacts to Penang and the planet.
We appeal to the federal government to revoke the EIA approval and cancel the PSR project.
The Penang Forum is a broad coalition of NGOs working towards local democracy and sustainable development.
The views expressed are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.