Heated tobacco products come under fire from researchers

Heated tobacco products come under fire from researchers

Experts say emissions from this so-called 'smoke-free' alternative to cigarettes 'fit the definition of both an aerosol and smoke'.

Heated tobacco products have soared in popularity as a ‘smoke-free’ alternative to cigarettes in recent years. (Envato Elements pic)
PARIS:
Heated tobacco products have soared in popularity as a “smoke-free” alternative to cigarettes in recent years, but a peer-reviewed report has suggested their emissions could be considered smoke – a claim strongly rejected by the tobacco industry.

Heated tobacco products, or HTPs, are often confused with e-cigarettes, which heat liquid that can contain nicotine but do not involve tobacco leaf.

HTPs instead use a high heat to decompose tobacco, via a process called pyrolysis, which does not set it on fire or burn it, therefore avoiding creating smoke.

The most popular and widely available HTP, Philip Morris International’s IQOS, is an electronic device that heats a tobacco-filled, paper-wrapped, cigarette-like stick at a temperature of up to 350°C.

Last month, a review of the available research by experts in pyrolysis from Britain’s Nottingham University found “chemical evidence that IQOS emissions fit the definition of both an aerosol and smoke”.

The paper, published in the American Chemical Society’s “Omega” journal, was funded by the STOP anti-tobacco initiative.

Its lead author, Clement Uguna, said IQOS emissions contain chemical compounds that are “in normal tobacco smoke, bush burning and wood smoke”.

“Hence, smoke arises simply by heating organic substances and does not necessarily involve fire,” he told AFP.

The paper also found that previous research on IQOS – the majority of which has been funded by the tobacco industry – had compared a stick to a typical cigarette.

However, IQOS sticks are much smaller, containing around 200mg of tobacco compared with 645mg for a standard cigarette, it said.

Because research by Philip Morris International did not use a “like against like” comparison, it “underestimated” the levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents from IQOS, the review added.

Philip Morris said the level of harmful and potentially harmful constituents in IQOS emissions – per stick – was “reduced on average by 90-95% compared to cigarette smoke”.

However, that level fell to 68% when comparing the tobacco content of the two products, the Nottingham University experts said, calling for more research.

‘Not smoke’

Philiip Morris told AFP that the paper “misleadingly leverages pieces of the scientific assessment while omitting other important pieces of evidence”.

The IQOS is an electronic device that heats a tobacco-filled, paper-wrapped, cigarette-like stick at a temperature of up to 350°C. (Philip Morris International pic)

“Numerous international combustion experts and a number of government agencies have reviewed the same evidence package and concluded that the IQOS aerosol produced is not smoke,” it said.

Reto Auer, a doctor at Germany’s University of Bern who has previously researched heated tobacco, praised the Omega paper, telling AFP it was “one of the rare reports to dare to tackle the question of ‘smoke’ so deeply”.

Jamie Hartmann-Boyce of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, an author of a highly regarded review on HTP science published earlier this year, said the “important” paper “made some very good points”.

“I think mechanistically there are a lot of reasons to suspect HTPs might be more harmful than e-cigarettes and possibly less harmful than traditional cigarettes – but we really need more data,” she told AFP.

IQOS is available in more than 60 countries under widely varying regulations, and sticks come in flavours such as menthol, cherry and grape, which critics say help attract younger users.

Last month, the European Commission proposed banning flavoured HTP varieties after stick sales in the EU soared more than 2,000% – from 934 million to nearly 20 billion – between 2018 and 2020.

Philip Morris told AFP that the “proposal from the commission is not underpinned by evidence”.

“It fails to prove, for instance, that flavours pose any additional health risks or that they attract a significant proportion of non-nicotine users,” it said.

Hartmann-Boyce said “there is every reason to be concerned about the extent to which the tobacco industry is manipulating the science and messages around new tobacco products”.

But she warned it was a “difficult balance” to communicate the risks of such products because of the overwhelming damage done by cigarettes. Tobacco kills half its users, according to the World Health Organization.

“If we say something is safer than cigarettes, that is not saying it’s safe – it’s like saying that this knife is safer than a loaded gun,” Hartmann-Boyce said.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.